A Critical Exposition of the Popular 'Jihád'
A Critical Exposition of the Popular 'Jihád'
Showing that all the Wars of Mohammad Were Defensive; and that Aggressive War, or Compulsory Conversion, is not Allowed in The Koran - 1885
WITH APPENDICESPROVING THAT THE WORD ''JIHAD'' DOES NOT EXEGETICALLY MEAN'WARFARE,' AND THAT SLAVERY IS NOT SANCTIONEDBY THE PROPHET OF ISLAM.
Book Excerpt
d the Jihád 116
91. When is Jihád a positive injunction ib.
92. The Hedáya quoted and refuted 117
93. Rule of interpretation 118
94. The Common Law and its commentators 119
95. Kifáya quoted 120
96. Further quotations 121
97. The Kifáya refuted 122
98. S. IX, 5, discussed 123
99. S. II, 189, discussed ib.
100. S. II, 189, and VIII, 40, are defensive 124
101. All injunctions were local and for the time being 125
102. Ainee quoted and refuted ib.
103. Sarakhsee quoted and refuted 126
104. Ibn Hajar quoted 128
105. Ibn Hajar refuted 129
106. Halabi quoted ib.
107. Halabi refuted 132
108. Ainee again quoted and refuted ib.
109. Continuation of the above 133
110. Traditions quoted and refuted ib.
111. Early Mosl
Editor's choice
(view all)Popular books in Religion, War, Philosophy
Readers reviews
0.0
LoginSign up
Be the first to review this book